Spór o uzależnienie od jedzenia

Within the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA), substance dependence is conceptualized as a psychiatric disorder marked by the compulsive use of psychoactive substances—despite the occurrence of significant adverse consequences affecting physical health, interpersonal relationships, or occupational performance. The core diagnostic criteria outlined in the DSM encompass the following dimensions:

• Impaired control over use (consumption of the substance in quantities or over durations exceeding initial intentions, repeated unsuccessful efforts to cut down or discontinue use, and devoting substantial time to procuring, using, or recovering from the substance’s effects);

• Social and occupational impairment (failure to fulfill major role obligations at work, school, or home due to substance use, along with interpersonal conflicts or withdrawal from social activities);

• Hazardous use (persistent substance consumption in situations where it is physically dangerous or exacerbates pre-existing medical or psychological conditions);

• Pharmacological indicators (the development of tolerance—requiring increased doses to achieve the desired effect—and the emergence of withdrawal symptoms, including both physical and psychological distress upon cessation or reduction of use).

While the APA does not formally recognize "food addiction" as a discrete diagnostic entity, this term is employed herein to describe patterns of excessive, compulsive eating that mirror the behavioral and neurobiological mechanisms of substance dependence. It is critical to distinguish compulsive eating from food addiction; research by C. G. Long, J. E. Blundell, and G. Finlayson revealed that 56.8% of individuals diagnosed with binge-eating disorder exhibited symptoms aligned with addictive processes. A growing body of literature explores the overlaps between DSM-defined substance use disorders and excessive eating, highlighting:

• Loss of control over the amount and frequency of food intake;

• Recurrent, unsuccessful attempts to reduce consumption or eliminate specific foods;

• Persistent eating despite adverse health outcomes (e.g., obesity, type 2 diabetes) or psychological distress (e.g., guilt, depressive symptoms).

The fifth edition of the DSM (DSM-5) introduced a new diagnostic subcategory—non-substance-related disorders—which includes gambling disorder but excludes excessive eating due to insufficient empirical evidence supporting its classification as an addiction. Nonetheless, the debate regarding the addictive potential of certain foods persists. Among the most robust assessment tools currently available is the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS), designed to measure behaviors analogous to those observed in substance dependence, thereby facilitating further research into this contested phenomenon.

The Yale Food Addiction Scale constitutes a meticulously structured 25-item instrument designed to evaluate indicators of addictive patterns related to food consumption. Responses are elicited through a four-tiered frequency scale (where "0" denotes "never" and "4" signifies occurrence four or more times per week or daily) or via binary "yes/no" selections, contingent upon the nature of each statement. The questionnaire primarily examines the affective experiences associated with eating behaviors, the degree of self-regulation over the intake of specific food items or meals, withdrawal-like symptoms or emotional responses that emerge following reduction or cessation of certain foods, and the individual’s inclination to discontinue consumption of problematic substances. Illustrative propositions that participants must evaluate include observations such as: recognizing a propensity to consume larger quantities of a particular food than initially intended; persisting in eating certain foods despite having attained physiological satiety; experiencing heightened cravings for specific items after a period of abstinence; associating food intake with adverse psychological states—including depressive mood, anxiety, guilt, or self-loathing; noting a diminished capacity of the same food quantity to alleviate negative emotions or enhance mood; and expressing a desire to cease consumption of particular foods. The inquiries pertain to edible products that the individual perceives as problematic, which typically encompass highly processed items characterized by elevated reward potential and sensory appeal.

The consumption of high-calorie foods, particularly those rich in fats or simple sugars, may elicit neurobiological responses comparable to those induced by addictive substances such as tobacco. Mere sensory exposure—whether olfactory or visual—to such foods can trigger an overwhelming, difficult-to-resist urge to consume them. Research conducted by J. G. Wang and colleagues has revealed that individuals with obesity exhibit reduced expression of dopamine D2 receptors within the mesolimbic system, a finding consistent with observations in cocaine, alcohol, or nicotine dependence. However, obesity itself does not equate to food addiction; as demonstrated by K. M. Pursey and associates, this issue may affect approximately 25% of individuals with excess body weight and around 11% of those with normal weight. Further evidence supporting the existence of food addiction emerges from neuroimaging studies: A. N. Gerhardt and team observed that participants with high scores on the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS) exhibited heightened activation in specific brain regions following the consumption of a high-calorie chocolate milkshake—a pattern reminiscent of that seen in substance use disorders. Additionally, D. de Ridder and co-authors recorded similar resting-state EEG activity patterns in high-YFAS individuals to those observed in alcohol-dependent subjects; no such similarities were found in low-YFAS participants. Moreover, studies by J. M. Burmeister and colleagues indicated that obese respondents with high YFAS scores reported significant difficulties in regulating food intake, particularly under stressful conditions. It is noteworthy that not all foods are equally addictive; for each individual, a different "trigger food" may exist, with ultra-processed products—high in added sugars and trans fats—posing the greatest risk.

A comprehensive study conducted by E. M. Schulte, N. M. Avena, and A. N. Gearhardt—encompassing over five hundred participants, including both university students and working professionals—sought to identify which food items exhibit the strongest correlation with addictive behavioral patterns. Participants completed the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS) questionnaire and were subsequently tasked with pinpointing which of the thirty-five listed products most frequently elicited the adverse responses described in the survey. The findings revealed that the items with the highest addictive potential were predominantly ultra-processed foods characterized by elevated fat content and a high glycemic load. The most commonly cited products included pizza, chocolate, French fries, ice cream, cookies, cakes, cheeseburgers, potato chips, popcorn, and muffins. The underlying mechanism appears to involve the activation of the brain’s reward circuitry, which may contribute to compensatory overeating behaviors. Notably, thermal processing of natural ingredients does not enhance their addictive properties; rather, the critical factor is the industrial addition of refined sugars and fats. Researchers emphasize that highly processed foods can trigger neurobiological responses analogous to those induced by psychoactive substances, thereby fostering the development of eating disorders with addictive features. While the classification of "food addiction" as a distinct behavioral disorder remains a subject of debate, an expanding body of scientific literature highlights significant parallels between this phenomenon and traditional substance dependencies—particularly in relation to foods rich in fats and simple carbohydrates.

The foundational step in addressing food addiction involves systematically identifying the specific foods or dishes that pose the greatest challenge to an individual’s self-control. There are two primary approaches to managing this: immediate cessation of consumption or a gradual, methodical reduction in intake. Each strategy has its own merits and requires distinct preparatory measures. For those opting for an abrupt withdrawal, thorough preparation is essential. This includes: – developing a detailed daily meal plan that incorporates the individual’s taste preferences to mitigate feelings of deprivation; – identifying accessible locations (such as health-conscious eateries, salad bars, or meal-delivery services specializing in nutritious options) where minimally processed, wholesome meals can be obtained when time or motivation for home cooking is lacking; – compiling an exhaustive list of anticipated benefits associated with eliminating ultra-processed foods—such as improved mood, sustained energy levels, or alleviation of health complications—which can serve as a motivational anchor during moments of vulnerability. However, it is widely acknowledged that sudden abstinence from habitual comfort foods is exceptionally difficult to sustain over time. Consequently, most experts advocate for a phased transition. Rather than outright eliminating favored yet unhealthy items, the emphasis should be placed on incrementally enhancing the diet with nutrient-dense alternatives. One might begin by ensuring at least two balanced meals per day or by augmenting every meal with high-quality ingredients (e.g., vegetables, whole grains, or lean proteins). With consistent adherence to this approach, the proportion of problematic foods in one’s diet will progressively diminish in favor of more nourishing choices. It is critical to recognize, however, that in cases of deeply entrenched addictive behaviors, self-directed efforts may prove insufficient. Under such circumstances, seeking guidance from a qualified therapist specializing in eating disorders—or participating in group therapy, which provides peer support and shared accountability—can be instrumental in achieving long-term success.