What's better, tuna or salmon?
Table of Contents
1. Energy charge
None of the sea creatures contain a single gram of carbohydrates, so you can't expect to get energy from eating fish, but tuna contains one calorie of energy per gram, and salmon contains 1.4 calories per gram.2. Benefits for muscle mass
100 grams of tuna contains about 23.4 grams, whereas salmon contains 19.8 grams per 100 g of product. But muscles don't just need protein. Studies by American scientists have shown that men who ate cholesterol in certain proportions increased their muscle mass better than those who tried not to eat cholesterol. Scientists suggest that cholesterol contributes to muscle regeneration, and salmon contains 55 mg of cholesterol, while tuna only has 44 mg.3. Regeneration after training
There's nothing like salmon when it comes to exercise regeneration. 100 g of this fish contains about 2018 mg of omega-3 fatty acids and only 243 mg of tuna. Studies in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition have shown that these fatty acid levels help reduce inflammation, which greatly facilitates and speeds up the recovery process after exercise.4. It's a tuna test
Many marine fish have elevated levels of chemical toxins, including methyl mercury. People who eat fish that are high in methylmercury often have nervous disorders tremor, impaired concentration, blindness. Is regular consumption of tuna harmful to their health? Scientific studies show that this is not the case. Studies have also been conducted among the inhabitants of Seychelles.5. It's a salmon test
In the past 10 years, imports of farmed salmon have tripled. However, the benefits of omega-3 fatty acids found in salmon, which have long been thought to help prevent many diseases, from heart disease to stroke, have been strongly recommended by the Swedish Centre for Food Economy. But according to researchers, all the risks associated with the use of salmon from the University of North Rhine-Westphalia, such as the toxicity of fatty fish in the liver and liver, can be seen as less beneficial in clinical trials.