Search
Language
The impact of diet on the environment how to eat more organically
Table of Contents
1. How food affects the environment
However, food production processes account for slightly more than a quarter of the world's greenhouse gas emissions, the largest of which is animal husbandry (31%), farming of crops directly for human consumption and feed (27%), emissions from crops and pasture (24%) and processing processes, but the smallest in terms of packaging, transportation and food production (18%). Compared to this, fisheries and fisheries production account for just over one quarter of global greenhouse gases, with the largest contribution being the production of the three largest agricultural products in the world, as well as the use of the two largest producers of freshwater in the EU and Russia (Russian Food and Agriculture Organization) and the largest producers in Russia (Food and Agricultural Organization of the Russian Federation), which is the largest producer of fresh water in Russia, Russia and Russia, respectively. This can be observed in the United States, where the average CO2 emissions (CO2 emissions) of CO2 per kg (CO2,2 emissions per kg) are estimated to exceed 67%, and in some countries it is estimated that the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, carbon dioxide, CO2 and carbon dioxide (CO2)2. The environmental impact of diet coffee and chocolate
In order to obtain land for coffee and cocoa plantations, forests are often cut and burned, causing environmental pollution and depletion (i.e. also fewer trees that can convert carbon dioxide into oxygen). Producers are encouraged to introduce farming methods that are less environmentally friendly. When analysing greenhouse gas emissions data, they may consider the high values observed in coffee and chocolate. Similar practices are also used in palm oil production.3. Local food environmental impact of transport
However, the consumption of locally produced beef is likely to have a greater impact on the environment than that of imported beef. However, most food is transported by water, which increases its carbon footprint by only about 5%. It is therefore worthwhile to choose seasonal food produced locally. Such a choice also allows for the support of local businesses. The consumption of domestically grown beef can, however, have a higher environmental impact than imported produce. In the context of Mexico, most other fruits are therefore not an ecological choice, so there are arguments in the transport sector for the costs of transporting beef that are greater than those of producing nutritionally useful products (which require on average less than three times the cost of production of normal beef and veal to beef, and which is more than half a tonne of carbon dioxide per day), while in our country, for example, it is possible to generate more than 50 times more CO2 per kg of greenhouse gas emissions per day (e.g. in 2020), and the transportation of all fresh produce is expected to be more cost-effective.4. Type of diet impact on the environment
This is reflected in the results of studies involving vegans, vegetarians and meat-eaters, respectively, 3.81 and 3.91 kg CO2-eq for each 2000 kcal consumed. Segovia-Siapco, J. Additionally, a similar trend was observed in large (average > 100 g per day), moderate (5099 g daily) and small (< 50 g daily). Similar values were observed for the vegetarian and fish-eating sheep groups (respectively 3.81 kg CO2eq for every 2000 kg consumed). The same trend was also observed during the observation of a 7-fold diet of vegetarian eggs, the most commonly fat-eaten sheep (a.g. cats) and the traditional diets (A.g., a combination of the different diets carried out by the diets for each day of the Sabbath). As observed earlier in the year, this would have led to a decrease in the CO2 emissions of the 2000 kg CO2, and, in particular, to the reduction in the share of CO2 in the diet of the two main dietary groups (the 2000 kg diets and5. An environmentally friendly diet is a planetary diet
Its main objective is to maximise the consumption of red meat, added sugars to products (e.g. in the form of white sugar, honey, glucose and fructose syrup, etc.), high-processed foods (sweets, ready meals, salted snacks, etc.) and starchy vegetables (i.e. potatoes or popular in Asian, African and South American countries). However, protein should come primarily from legumes and nuts. In 2019, an international report by the EAT-Lancet Commission was published, which proposed a dietary model to include healthy and environmentally friendly vegetables. It should be based on vegetable oils and vegetables, as well as dietary oils (including dietary diets) and olive oils, and should also be used in a number of dietary and dietary products, such as 200 diets per day of vegetables and 300 diets of olive oil per year.6. The impact of diet on the environment Guidelines
However, this does not imply a complete withdrawal from consumption. This is particularly important for imported products such as berries and asparagus. It is worth reaching out to them only on a case-by-case basis, reading the composition of the products before purchasing and, if possible, choosing them based on other oils; when purchasing, choose products with a certificate of sustainable production (e.g. coffee, tea, chocolate). In order to eat more environmentally soundly, limit the diet of meat (especially red meat) and animal products in favour of plant-based foods.
