Search
Language
The GAPS diet has its advantages and disadvantages
Table of Contents
1. The GAPS diet is defined
His concept is based on the existence of a connection between the brain and the digestive tract, whereby these organs interact with each other. However, it is important to emphasize that this notion is based solely on the author's observations and that there is currently a lack of reliable data collected from the observations of a large group of patients in clinical trials that would confirm the existence and consequences of this syndrome. Gut And Psychology Syndrome, GAPS) is a term described in 2004 by Dr. Campbell-McBride in his book By GAPS: Digestive Brain Syndrome.2. The GAPS diet is based on assumptions
The menu is based largely on animal foods: meat, fish, eggs and animal fat. The use of microwaves is prohibited and the food consumed should be organic. The full cycle takes an average of 2.53 years. Additionally, when using the diet, supplements are recommended: probiotics (preparations containing bacteria beneficial to the gut flora and functioning of the digestive tract), liver oil (sources of unsaturated fatty acids, omega-3, vitamin A and D), essential fatty products or fatty foods, and the enzyme GAPS, which is used in the diet.3. The GAPS diet has its advantages
It also does not require the introduction of intentional calorie restrictions, but at the initial stage, due to the list of permitted and prohibited products, it is very difficult to provide the body with an adequate amount of energy. Its use does not involve the need to calculate the energy value or macronutrients in the meal, only recommends the consumption of individual products.4. The GAPS diet has its drawbacks
The GAPS diet also requires good culinary skills, as most meals must be prepared independently including household oxygen and dietary fiber. It also requires a large amount of time when starting a diet, which may involve the need to change purchasing habits and seek out places that offer such food. In the later period, the risk of deficiencies is very high, especially due to the absence of GAPS (which is linked to the effects of the remaining foodstuffs and grains), the application of the B dietary model to households, and the use of the micro-element of the dietary fibre, which is based on the fact that it is not used in the preparation of dietary supplements, and that it does not involve a significant amount of energy, for example, due to a lack of the nutritional benefits of the GAPS program and the lack of nutrients and nutrients, which can be linked to a rigorous dietary dietary system.5. The GAPS diet recommendations for use
It is also not a model designed and recommended for weight reduction. In order to determine the benefits and drawbacks, as well as the long-term effects of its use, it is necessary to conduct extensive research. It is worth noting that the GAPS diet is currently not recommended by evidence-based medicine guidelines as a way of eating in specific disease units.6. The GAPS diet is controversial
However, the restrictions implemented also make it difficult to ensure adequate amounts of nutrients. Based on observations of nutritional programmes from this group (e.g. the Paleo diet, the Atkins diet) it has been observed that their prolonged use has a negative effect on health (A. In some cases, they also have an improved scientific approach to dietary supplements. Tahreem et al. 2022). The restrictions also impede the availability of adequate nutrient levels. It is difficult to observe that dietary programmes from that group (i.e. the Taleo Diet, the A. Atkins Diet) have a negative impact on the health status of patients (a. In this respect, the earlier diets also have a better approach to supplementary and supplementary diets than those tested and recommended therapeutic methods.7. The GAPS diet is an alternative
The GAPS diet is a very restrictive program requiring a lot of sacrifice and careful preparation and planning of meals, the short- and long-term effects of which are difficult to predict due to the lack of scientific evidence for its effectiveness.
