It's stew, which means there's not much meat in the meat

1. What is a pair really?

2. MOM, which means mechanically separated meat

3. Is it even a match to what you're looking for when you shop?

1. What is a pair really?

. the desire for this food product is not unjustified most parrots in frightening quantities contain all possible pollutants and to a lesser extent meat. So what, besides meat, can be found in this dessert of many of us? the emulsion, on the label also known as skin already the same definition gives assurance that it is not a good thing; it is a mixed raw pork or also a poultry which is a cheaper but a little more nutritious; phosphorus in the form of E450, which produces E451 and E452 if it can be mentioned in the list of ingredients of the animal, it is better to reject phosphorous in its composition; this is still important for the manufacturer to make use of the same type of protein, which is very important in the production of phosphores, and it is important to consider whether the use of this type of proteins is important in determining whether they are a good source of nutrients for the animal. The question arises as to whether phosphors in the

2. MOM, which means mechanically separated meat

Contrary to popular belief in poultry, the feet and the skin of the neck and head should not be used, and in the meat of another type bones and tails. In the final stage of production, this mass is transformed into a uniform cardboard, ideally suited for the production of, for example, parrots. It is worth reading the labels of the purchased pairs unfortunately, it is also easy to find ones that can contain up to 70% of MOM instead of real meat.

3. Is it even a match to what you're looking for when you shop?

While it is worth reducing their consumption to a minimum, we do not have to give them up altogether. The presence of phosphorus in our composition is a sufficient reason to put the product on the shelf; the most important element is the quantity of meat if the MOM or the meat content is minimal in the first place we should give up the purchase of such a product; the highest quality parrots contain more than 70% of meat, and even those with more than 90% of its content can be found; the presence of phosphates in the composition of the product is sufficient reason for putting the product off the shelves, however, it is important to choose parrors without significant emissions, i.e. skins, but if there are manufacturers with the lowest prices should make up a maximum of 10% of the ingredient; it can be difficult to keep the price of the parrols as a single component; if we sell the children's parrons quickly, but it is better to use them, then we should not use them at all, and therefore, as a matter of course, we must not use